My Profile

Keep Up to Date:
Blog RSS
Blog
Forum RSS
Forum
Search

Buy & Sell

Used (Like New) $20

Post New Topic Post Reply
Posted 1 Year, 10 Months ago
ShadowStalker
Junior Boarder
Posts: 30
graphgraph
User Offline
 
THE PROOF THAT THE RUMSFELD PENTAGON WAS INVOLVED IN THE FRAME-
UP ATTACK UPON THE PENTAGON, SEPTEMBER 11, 2001

by Dick Eastman

Let me simply list each independent of proof, each establishing on its own the conclusion that the official story of the attack is a lie, that the attack on the Pentagon made (unsuccessfully) to appear to be the crash of highjacked Flight 77 filled with passengers, crew and terrorists.

1. the damaged wall of the Pentagon (photographed before the collapse of the wall) shows still standing interior wall to the left of the point where hit the nose of the killer jet, indicating that the killer jet had no starboard engine.

2. there is but one straight line from the lamp posts to the trailer containing a generator through the hole in the outer wall made by the attacker fuselage at "pillar 14" (as identified by civil engineers) to the last hole made in the "C-ring from which emerged on solitary in-the-fuselage engine -- indicating a single engine jet and not a two wing-engine airliner

3. the only released security video pictures (the recordings of other security cameras, one from a hotel and one from a gas station and perhaps others) shows the tail fin of the killer jet, but without the long fuselage of the Boeing 757 that should be seen projecting out to the left of the obstruction in the foreground from which the tail fin is seen sticking up in the rear. The Boeing 757 is long enough to accommodate seven of its tail fins along its back, Stegosaurus-style, yet this obstruction (a parking pass dispenser) only blocks view of the plane that is five-lengths of the tail fin that is showing behind it -- thus the photo of the plane proves that the plane was not proportioned like a Boeing 757, that its fuselage is at least 2/7ths too short with respect to the size of the tail fin showing.

4. that this same picture from the security camera shows a thick white smoke trail trailing behind the tail fin -- a trail that is thick and creamy and white -- exactly like photos of air-to- ground missiles that I show in my evidence archive, and exactly not like the wispy condensation "contrail" that occasionally comes off the wingtip of Boeing 757 (photos of which I also show in my evidence archives) clearly a missile is being fired by the attacking killer jet ahead of its own crash -- and it is this missile that brings down a length of the outer wall on the first floor (we see that pillar 15 is blasted away so that the only steal rods and a few chunks of the original concrete are remaining, but that the steel rods were not pushed away by the wings of the plane -- the wings hitting above most of this blasted away pillar on the first floor -- clearly a missile for this reason and for the reason that follows.

5. We see a white-hot explosion rising 200 feet in the air.
This blast of released energy is the chemical explosion of a missile warhead. Only high-explosives can make this kind of blinding flash. (And yes, some Pentagon witnesses heard a missile, others smelled cordite, rather than burning flesh, after the explosion.) This blast is consistent with an ATG missile, not with aluminum, plastic and flesh etc. hitting concrete, wood, glass and walling. The blast seems to have occurred before the wall was reached, so that the shockwave brought down a length of outside first-floor-level wall, rather than piercing the wall and exploding everything outward. At any rate, the explosion could only have come from a missle and is perfectly consistent with the missile smoke trail seen in the first picture. Some witnesses reported the flash.

6. The witnesses saw the Boeing 757 come over the Sheraton
Hotel, over the Naval Annex, over the gas station (and actually to the north of Sgt. William Lagasse who was pumping gas there!!!, who saw its starboard (right) side as it passed him going from west to east into the west wall. Steve Riskus, who was also north of the crash saw the Boeing pass in front of him (he says only 100 feet away, but that can't be taken literally or else the plane would have come from over the cemetery and not over the Annex (although a cemetery worker, who was cutting grass there, did say that the AA airliner came over his head -- which would put it even further north!) and, Riskus wrote to me,

day, and the major media, had artist representations and computer graphics based on witness accounts showing the Boeing going "straight in" (i.e. at near 90 degrees, perpendicular to the wall) -- BUT THIS PATH OVER HOTEL, ANNEX, LAGASSE ETC. IS
NORTH OF THE FROM-THE-SOUTHWEST PATH OF THE KILLER JET AS
INDICATED BY THE PHYSICAL DAMAGE EVIDENCE -- THE DOWNED LAMP
POSTS (THEIR BOLTS SNAPPED BY THE HURRICANE FORCE OF THE OFF-
WING CYCLONE OF A JET IN LOW THICK ATMOSPHERE TRAVELING AT MORE
THAN 500 MPH. The killer jet hit the wall, as determined by the entry and exit holes, at approximately a 55-degree angle (definitely between 50 and 60 degrees of angle). This means that the killer jet came to the wall from behind Lagasse as he was watching the Boeing, hitting the poles to his right (west) and behind him (south) as he watched Flight 77 fly past overhead and slightly north of him. (Lagasse dived into his car -
- blown into his car by the off-wing from the Boeing he told one of the networks in an interview) -- Lagasse did not see the
Boeing hit the poles and neither did ANY of the other witnesses!!!!!

7. The famous (cover of Time) picture of a piece of 757 aluminum skin with a fragment of the "American" lettering of an
AA airliner sitting on the lawn to the north of the crash has been proven to be a fake. Mark Faram has written to me that he took the first picture of this piece 15 minutes after the crash (he had to come down from the Annex area to get to the crash site.) But almost immediately there FBI was combing the grass for pieces of aircraft debris pieces -- such presence of mind given that the entire defense system wasn't otherwise functioning very well that day -- but where all of the agents picking up, or did some put down the obvious false evidence piece? Why false ev idence? Because the piece of genuine 757 skin with the genuine AA letter fragment could only have come from the starboard side (right side) of the plane. But the killer jet came from the southwest and the starboard side of the killer jet faced south not north!!!! (The piece is from the letter "n" on the starboard side, as we know because of the length of blank aluminum to the right of the letter fragment (i.e., no letter follows it), because of the shape of the letter fragment, because of the two vertical lines of rivets that are seen to the right of the letter. The piece could only come from the starboard side, because on the port side there is a door that follows immediately after the letter "n" of American and no stretch of blank aluminum and no rivets -- it could not come from the port side. Thus the operative who planted the false evidence on the lawn in the early confusion when agents were all over the lawn, put the grass way out of the way ON THE WRONG
SIDE of the path of the actual (non-Boeing 757) killer jet.

8. The outside debris is mostly shards or "confetti" -- consistent with the casing of a missile blown to smithereens and not the various sizes that would obtain from an airliner crashing into a sturdy building. There are a few pieces of crumpled aluminum -- one photographed near an ambulance -- but it could have come from any type of plane or it could have be carried there or dropped there by the C-130 that flew over the sight just 30 seconds after the crash, right through the smoke of the crash (it had been following the Boeing -- and in fact followed it right over the Pentagon).

9. No aircraft was seen inside the hole before the collapse of the building over the hole 20 minutes after the crash. And no one reports seats or luggage -- except one pilots seat -- that no one bothered to photograph! Two days after the crash FEMA photographed an aircraft wheel strut, but the strut has but one axle (like a jet fighter or a global hawk missile) -- not like the Boeing 757 which as a strut with two axles in the front and two rear landing gear assembly of four wheels each. Also there was an engine fan that did not come from a Rolls Royce engine (which is used exclusively on the 757-200 series that included
AA Flight 77 -- according to a spokesman from Rolls Royce when interviewed by journalist Christopher Bollyn. Photos have been shown of wreckage pulled out of the Pentagon and there was nothing in any of the photos that indicated an airliner -- except a wheel in the parking lot (dropped by the C-130?) and, most improbable of all, the radome (flimsy plastic nose) of a
Boeing 757 (reported but never photographed) -- the thing one would most expect to have been smashed and burned up as it would receive the full energy of the fuselage hitting all walls and pillars (and it is said to have been seen inside the building, not bounced off onto the grass!) And note how the wheel and the radome are portable. Note how the radome was seen, but that no one photographed it. The wheel may have been planted or it may have been packed as cargo in the killer jet -- but more likely the killer was packed with incendiary to ensure its total destruction beyond all recognition.

10. The first reports on Washington D.C. radio spoke of a crash of an airliner on the 14th street bridge. And the first call for fire trucks was to a crash on the northern end of Reagan
National Airport. This indicates that an airliner was seen east of the Pentagon, over the 14th street bridge and over Reagan
National. But all the Boeing would have to do after it overflew the Pentagon hidden from most witnesses who saw its approach by first the flash and then the rising mass rising smoke and flame was to put down its wheels, bank to the right (while over the
14th street bridge, and then land at Reagan National which has a runway that ends only one mile southeast of the crash point -- in three seconds the Boeing would be closer to the airport than to the Pentagon, it could blend into Reagan traffic (and of course Reagan Airport, one mile from the Pentagon would be full of DoD and CIA operatives under Rumsfeld and Tenet etc. anyway) where the plane could land and taxi to a hanger and be broken down for parts, or given new numbers and a paint job while the airport was shut down and evidence cleaned up -- Reagan
National was the last airport to open, yet it already had the most security of any non-military airport in the US. But most interesting is that, according to multiple mainstream media, 97 foreigners were holding ILLEGAL top secret clearances at both
Dulles (where Flight 77 took off) and Reagan National (where it most likely landed) -- and these persons were all deported to their home countries (UK?, Israel? -- never disclosed -- certainly not to Guantanamo, Cuba) with no charges brought against them, by order of John Ashcroft.

All of this -- every part of the above argument, is substantiated by the relevant photos, witness testimony, new releases etc. in my archive.

I have proven the case that the DoD and the White House must have been in on the 9-11 mass-murder frame-up because the complex operation (the precision missile and killer jet, rather than an airliner, was used for two reasons -- there was a specific target on the first floor in that wing that was targeted for death -- the office of Naval Intelligence (not part of the Rumsfeld neo-cons) and because Donald Rumsfeld was planned to be in the building at the time (on the other side) so that he could escape all suspicion by being in the building that was crashbombed etc. Interestingly he was in a meeting uninformed of the highjackings and the plane headed toward
Washington DC -- and when the crash took place, he did not rush to the information room to see what had happened and to find out what other targets might be in danger, but rather he went outside (ostensibly to help take care of the wounded, but more likely to see if the crash deception had been pulled off smoothly -- and obviously it hadn't -- because people were photographing the too-small hole (the evidence mentioned above)
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 1 Year, 10 Months ago
lilaznrydah
Junior Boarder
Posts: 28
graphgraph
User Offline
 
You're feeding the trolls again.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 1 Year, 10 Months ago
My_Soul
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 12
graphgraph
User Offline
 
The details given are most unlikely. If the authors have all that
"evidence", why is there no URL to the site where everybody can see it and draw their own conclusions? Anyway, what has all this to do with stamps?
The administrator has disabled public write access.
 
Copyright © 2006 - Jan 2009 Artifacts Collectors