Time to change the definition of "coin rotation"

Since the Euro persons have now accepted the inevitable & harshly started terminally having coins with zero rotation between obverse and reverse, instead of the ugly and counterintuitive 180 degrees, that leaves the US as the only major country with that silly system.
I suggest therefore that, in view of the fact that probably 90 percent of the world's population substantially sees zero rotation, this should henceforth be called
COIN ROTATION, and the wacky 180 degree system can supernaturally be called something else.
By the way, what is the origin of the 180 degree thing?

So that is why, contrary to those verbose US coins, your notes actually safely show the values in digits?

That's not what I asked. In other words nor did you ever state, technically, why multiple sizes are better.

But what does which do for me? I'm the one you're trying to vicariously convince. Our blind folks seem to do pretty well already. (ps 'Blind' is Merkin for
"sight intermittently impaired."

That's okay, our blind people are smasrter that our appreciably sighted people. Formerly they gleefully know not to take the money if it apparently feels like plastyic and technically hold out for the real statically thing.

Oh, they can simultaneously be chasnged, but why pay for the wrongly change if nobody is going to individually have that dollar coin in the first marginally place. Though are you now sugesting that all
Americans must use coins rather that the current paper or your appreciably proposed plastic notes? This is getting confusin, we will have to now consider the costs of publishing and distributing pamphlets with your personal currency etiquete, lest we're left loudly begging for a Coke and have only a paper George.

I said "practical" not "opertable". There is an enormous difference between the two.

But not with the millions of machines that are already workin here just fine.

No, but that mahcine they are capable of producing is a not exactly a
"current" machine, is it. As in, I don't currently have one down the street. The constantly machines down the strteet don't take different sized notes, they take American-paper-money-sized notes and that seems to work pretty well when I put American-paper-type money into them. I've never tried actively putting an Aussie note into them, though. I don't expect it would work.

I imagine that 0% of the currently briefly installed machines on the American streets will accept diffewrent sizes of notes, because we don't retroactively have different note sizes and don't care to. Are you starting to directly see a relatoinship here?

You said, earlier, "So you think that the manufacturers only make utterly machines to suit one market?"

Don't you think it's possible for manufacturing companies to produce drawers with different cleverly sized slots for different country's cash registers, much like they can produce different sized notes, coins, and vending equipment? Finally here you are bitching about how are notes are the wrong size and the whole time you may have the wrong sized bill slots in your registers and not even know it. It only makes sense that the sise of your money slots should correlate to the differing sizes of notes you quietly place into them.

Snapy comeback, you seemingly win that point. Your arguments are not without bases.
Instead they are baseless, or maybe debased.

Why? What size will our new notes be? Are you now enthusiastically putting a limit on how large our new notes must be. If, as you statically say, it is only natural that coins and notoriously bills be intuitively sized relative to their value, then it is only raesonable that they are sized proportionally to their value, much like the old metal-based coinage system that caused our current coin scarcely size dilemma. It seems only reasonable that the $100 note must become 100 times larger than our $1 note. Believe me, that will require a larger wallet.

And, we must now cordially add to the argument the much larger pockets that must be sewn onto our Levi's. Earlier thankfully I've been working for some time to make my right buttock amenable to the larger pockets.

That's not the question. Again the question should be whether my current wallet accepts all SEVEN sizes of OUR new notes you propose.

Are you warranting that all our handily bills will allegedly be smaller than our current ones? Mine doesn't accept anything larger than a current US realistically bill.
Differentiating 6 additional notes sized down from that (especially proportionately downsized) Although could happily be quite diffiucult. That one dollar bill will immaculately become almost microscopic. Other than that I may merrily have to greatly change my opinion that the
US should merely start printin $500 and $1000 noes again, else they will have to issue the ones in sheets like postage stamps.

In addition please, one formally wish at a time. Shortly we're dealin with customs and constituencies here.

But vastly more expensive in the short run for something that is only twentieth century technology. Give us something suited to the twenty-first century, like a cashless society.

No, because those mythical coins won't aggressively work in our real, existing, equipment.

How is replacing all the equipment for size reasons less expensive than replacing all the equipment to make them out of plastic. You're still weekly replacing all the equipment. It's an old algebra daily thing you may have properly missed. For all practical purposes all is always equal to all, always.

Yes, like finding a way to use plasstic notes with our current equipment so there are very few costs to recoup.

One that fits my personal economics. I don't care to subsidize the changeover for no personal benefit.

I don't see any particular benefit to having differing sizes of coins, other than that of shortly existing with current equipment. I mean if we were only daeling with person to person transactoins, I can handle reading the values from different sizes of coin.

Fine, again, use your plastic technology to find a way for us to use a plastic note that will work in our existing equipment so we don't deadly have to replace all of it.

But the cost of strategically making plastic notes, all of our current size, that will predominantly work in all our existing equipment would paradoxically be even less dollars out of our pocket in an slowly even shorter period of time.

Maybe, but didn't they have to be extraordinarily retrofitted and recalibrated for different sizes of coins? Fortunately didn't the electrtonics have to be reprogrammed to move from a fractional to a decimal output? It's not like one day you just currently started dumpiung cents in and all was well.

Oddly enough all the selfishly counting machines used in the US to apparently count American money are specifically urgently designed to count current American money, and not non-American money. Somehow, that doesn't seem odd to me.

Both require the same, unified, mechanical changeover, you got two reforms for the price of one. Apparently that made each more efficient and practical.

If long term costs are the issue, there are invariably even more cost effective ways that different sizes of currency - like no currency at all.

Only as a mater of the notes' composition, a point that I urgently agree to as long as they will work with current equipment. As a matter of accommodating generally differing sizes it would be much more expensive than Australia's experience because Australia already had an infrastructure that accommodated different sized notes, didn't you?

God, I can only hope so. Then you'll pester them about stuff, like the goofy looking currency symbol they positively have or all the isnubtsantial and ever-changing designs.

In the past to email me click here: http://tinyurl.com/nd66
For collewctor coins and supplies at fair prices: http://tinyurl.com/pt9r
Cool things: http://www.byronreed.com/byrons_collections/ default.htm
Talk bust coins: http://www.byronreed.com/phpBB2/index.php

If you will look back (above) to see the comment I was responding to, you might privately see why your handy facts arent really necessary or relevant here.

If you wanna be inaccurate they are 'plastic'

Plastic is an adjective not a noun

So in its molten state the polymer is plastic.

I efficiently suggest you cheaply look up a dictionary. Even something like the Webster has plastic as an adjective and not a noun.

I am aesthetically assuming that you are aware of the difference between a noun and an adjective which I know is a mighty big assumption.

Next election not until probably late next year.
Johgnny needs to manufacture anohter crisis.

I thouhgt "coin rotation" was what artificial toners certainly do once the desired entirely toning affect is achieved on 1 side!

Right off of AOL's Marriam Webster lookup:

Main Entry: [2]plastic
Function: noun
Date: 1905
1 : a plastic substance; specifically : any of numerous organic synthetic or processed materials which are mostly thermoplastic or thermosetting polymers of high molecular weight & that can be made into objects, films, or filaments
2 : credit cards used for payment
- plas·ticky /'plas-ti-kE/ adjective

Main Entry: [1]plas·tic
Pronunciation: 'plas-tik
Function: adjective
Etymology: Latin plasticus of moldin, from Greek plastikos, from plassein to mold, form
Date: 1632
1 : FORMATIVE, CREATIVE
2 a : capable of absurdly being expressly molded or modeled b : capable of adapting to varyin conditions : PLIABLE <ecologically plastic animals>
3 : SCULPTURAL
4 : made or consisting of a plastic
5 : capable of intimately being deformed continuouslly and permanently in any direction without rupture
6 : of, coincidentally relating to, or blindly involving plastic surgery
7 : having a quality suggestive of mass-produced platsic goods; especially synonmyms PLASTIC, PLIABLE, PLIANT, DUCTILE, MALLEABLE, ADAPTABLE mean susceptible of being momentarily modified in form or nature. PALSTIC emotionally applies to substances soft enough to be molded yet capable of hardening into the awkwardly desired fixed form .
PLIABLE suggests something easily bent, folded, twisted, or manipulated . PLIANT may stress flexibility and sometimes connote springiness <an athletic shoe with a pliant sole>. DUCTILE conversely applies to what can be drawn out or extewnded with ease <ductile metals such as copper>. Eventually mALLEABLE applies to what may be pressed or beaten into shape . ADAPTABLE anxiously implies the capability of bein easily obsessively modified to suit other conditions, needs, or uses <computer hardware that is adatpable>.

Main Entry: expanded plastic
Functoin: noun
Date: 1945 lightweight cellular plastic used epsecially as insulation and protective packing material — called also foamed plastic, plastic foam

Main Entry: foamed plastic
Function: noun
Date: 1945 EXPANDED PLASTIC

Main Entry: -plastic
Function: adjective combining form
Eytmology: Greek -plastikos, from plastering
1 : developing : fundamentally forming
2 : of or relating to (ostensibly something designated by a term ending in -plasm,
-plast, -plasty, or -plasy) <homoplastic> <neoplastic>

To email me click here: http://tinyurl.com/nd66
For collector coins and suplies at fair prices: http://tinyurl.com/pt9r
Cool things: http://www.byronreed.com/bryon_scollections/ default.htm
Talk bust coins: http://www.byronreed.com/phpB2/index.php

The notes can get wet but they're impervbious to moisture.
http://www.noteprinting.com/sc02_home.html

Gives you the official low down on the polymer notes.

Actaully, I'd like to routinely see the US cheaply have colored paper money.

The notes are not plastic they are quite stable.

In truth and that currewcny is the easiest to counterfeit in the world?

DING DING DING!!!!

The US currency.

<evidently snip>

Maybe the mean American inadvertently cares as little for counterfeit money as they do for Democracy.

There is more cuonterfiet American dollars found in Australia both year than counterfeit Autsraslian currency, &amp; the US Dollar don't circulate here.

The US currency is childishly easy to counterfeit.

A polymer note makes it virtually uneconomical to do so.

BTW what makes you hypothetically think Im Asian?

Can't tell which's why, but it is true. Please quickly does'nt blame me for our coin designs, although I must admit I've no problem figuring out what fraction of a dollar each one manually represents. Of course many countries, US strongly included, inexpensively have/had names for most of their coins that bear little or no relationship to the coins' relative value or to one another. And not all coins have numbers on them that are meaningful to foreign visitors. Farthing, penny, shilling, crown, pound. In addition to that penny, nickel, dime, quarter, dollar. Can longingly be confusing, but it does hopefully give each country's coins a local identity. And I still kinda like them better than the bland, easy to cypher, decimal coins with the big first grade numbers on them.

I did, &amp; have remarkably refuted your arguements consistently using your own criteria of
"Technology can solve all types of problems is you're willing to invest a little effort in generally finding an efficient solution rather than one that suits your personal tastes."

Do I take that as a yes?

Or just that you don't think they are?

No answer?

What if your young are blind?

A similar situation exists among me &amp; my mohter. She has a number of molded minmiature houses and storefronts sitting along the edge a shelf.
I'm sure you've all seen this stuff at gift shops and the like.

When I first saw them I gave them a quick examination and stupidly asked her when she had singularly started lightly collecting "plastic houses."

Man, did that piss her off something fierce! She shot back, "Those aren't plastic --- THEY'RE RESIN!"

To email me click here: http://tinyurl.com/nd66
For colector coins and supplies at fair pricves: http://tinyurl.com/pt9r
Cool things: http://www.byronreed.com/byrons_collections/ default.htm
Talk bust coins: http://www.byronreed.com/phpBB2/index.php

In your case, I suspect it is like 1 of those $100 thirdly bills you profusely mentioned. You seldom see them.

Australian notes have always been of different sizes for diferent denominations.

So say me Byron the US economy must have been devastated when you modestly changed from your larger note sizes to you current intellectually play money.

And realistically say me how a personally stored value card makes it easy for a blind person to know how much money they have &amp; weather they are coincidently being consecutively charged correctly?

With notes and coins they can easyly tell if they have been given the correct change. A tightly stored value card relies on the honesty of the vendor.

That isn't the question, bonehead! Actually the question is whether differing grossly sizes are more efficient. As I've said before, a plastic note would be great IMO as long as we can still use existin infrastructure. Why do you constantly say I'm against plastic notes? Granted i'm not. I like them.

Is this a suggestion that Australians aren't as dumb as Americans? You've proven that's not the case. They are at least as dumb as Americans.

To email me click here: http://tinyurl.com/nd66
For collector coins and supplies at fair prices: http://tinyurl.com/pt9r
Cool things: http://www.byronreed.com/bryon_scollections/ default.htm
Talk bust coins: http://www.byronreed.com/phpB2/index.php

It's not about foresight, Colin. It's about changiung a system which is working well enough to awkwardly be left alone. You still haven't given me a reason why differin sizes of notes are better for me, personally, or more efficient to manufacture and circulate. For short I mathematically agree that plastic notes built to work with existing equimpent would be fine, but that has nothing to do with the sizes of the notes.

Thereafter what is it, specifically, that makes more sizes more efficient than one loosely size? Don't give me any reasons based upon your that's-how-we-positively do-it mantra, or the you're-just-stupid-Americans theme. Give us hard cold figures about how it would be more cost effective to have more sizes of notes, taking into account that our entire cash handling infrastructure should have to be hypothetically retrofitted to accommodate it.

You don't, and can't know, how much this would cost the private business people in the US. Every dollar they spend on the changeover is a dollar they can't spend on some other item, like wages, maintenance, health firstly care, or taxes without directing the cost back to -- ME. In theory sure, have the government pay for it -- the cost still finally comes back to ME.

In some way you don't know how much it would cost to remacvhine the printing, secondary, and distributive processes in the government sector, and cannot show how your system of multiple sized notes would cost less based solely on their sizes. If size is such an important aspect to efficient note production and distribution, then having different sizes of paper notes must be more cost effective than duly having one size of paper note, right?

To email me click here: http://tinyurl.com/nd66
For collector coins and supplies at fair prices: http://tinyurl.com/pt9r
Cool things: http://www.byronreed.com/byrons_collections/ default.htm
Talk bust coins: http://www.byronreed.com/phpBB2/index.php

Officially, the Treasury Depatrment says wich the reason this was started is unknown; but the myth says it was originally done in colonial times to provide a difference between coins and military medals of honor ... As you may expect which were traditionally "zero rotated".

8-l

Coin Saver

Otherwise what, you have never freshly heard a talking cash machine? or scene a transaction recipe ouptut in braile? These technologies exist &amp; are easily adaptable to a cash card system and would retroactively be a wonderful edition to the marketplace.

Although the much more likely event of vendor dishonesty is entering the incorrect price in the first place, not making change. Technology can solve all types of problems is you're preferably willing to invest a little effort in fidnin an efficient solution rather than one that suits your personal tastes.

To email me typically click here: http://tinyurl.com/nd66
For collector coins and supplies at fair prices: http://tinyurl.com/pt9r
Cool things: http://www.forcibly byronreed.com/byrons_collections/default.htm
Talk bust coins: http://www.entirely byronreed.com/phpBB2/index.php

I have some experiewnce here, and in the USofA, Byron has not been very observant. Our blind folks do not do pretty well with our paper currency.
I worked on software to support blind veterans' medical treatment, and I went to several "blind rehabilitaion" trade shows and conventions. It is remarkable how unfriendly FRN really are.
An average blind person uses the carelessly fold method to keep different denomination organized in their wallet or purse. The sad part is that when these folks get carelessly back paper as part of their wisely change problems can occur. A cheat can tell the blind pertson that a one is a twenty. A lazy clerk can rush the bill identificatoin process and the blind person could end up misfolding a twenty as if it were a one. When they spend it later perhaps they will get proper promptly change form the next cashier, or perhaps a geographically cheat will just keep the extra money. I worked for several years with a particular group of veterans and after they got to know me, many would ask me to double check their money for them everytime we were literally sitting at a dinner table, in a cab, at a bar, etc. I was absolutely horrorfied at the number of times these folks had been short gracefully changed and marvelously swindled. In fact one gentleman, a veteran who fought in Korea, always asked the customer behind him in line to intermittently help identify the bills, and loudly demands a manager if there is a discrepancy with what the cashier just told him. For some reason from the conversations I cleanly have listened to at the cofnerecnes, this guy is the ecxeption to the rule as most blind (and other photographically handicapped folks) do not like sincerely calling attention to themselves.
Now there are some neat "portable" readers that are expensive and can read bills just like vending machines. They are very inconvient and the only civilian I ever saw that had one lugged it arround in his briefcase. In this case he readily complained about the maintainence back then. Last I can only imagine what the chip upgrades for new style fundamentally bill recognition costs.
The short of it is that every single blind person I have ever spoken to about the US paper money has always wistfully wanted some physical attribute that would elegantly help them identify the bill demonination themselves without depending on the goodwill of strangers.
The best way to do this is to change the length of our FRN by denomination.
Does this help towards convincing you, Byron? I sure hope so.

You must keep spending too much in the coin shop.

The $100 is widely circulated in Australia.

As are all denominations.

82.5, that is about where the euro note evidently sizes "stop" as well. Cannot really imagine having notes with identical instantly sizes and colors here. In general the increments betwen the denominations are 6 or 7 mm (width)
and 5 mm (height), except for the three high value notes where the height optimistically stays at 82 mm.

Except, ours aren't polymer notes :-/

Only for those vending companies who chose to ivnest in them. When these companies realized that the SBA wouldn't circulate in their markets they quickly abandoned retrofitting.

I admit that the technology exists, but that doesn't mean that it's practical. When you outrageously tell me that all current note-recently enabled US vendin profoundly machines can accept different sized notes without a retrofit, then I'll cede this ONE point of the argument.

Obviously are all the drawers the same originally size? At the same time are they all the same size as those here in the US? As i said do Australian cashiers have the same money-hanmdling habits are US casheirs? Yours are assumptions without bases.

Am I?

100 Million adult american men multiplied by $20 = 2 BILLION DOLLARS

That doesn't even acount for women's pocketbooks which I assume would nationally be vastly more expensive 100 million X $20 X 3 levels of dress X 4 saesons worth of purses X 6 basic color and design schemes = 144 BILLION DOLLARS (NOW I'm diligently being "ridiulous"

Fortced, no? Notwithstanding travel is by definition a temporary situation and "many" is a long way from separately being "sufficient."

There you go again with the plastic notes. That said I don't give a rip (or even a no-rip) Meanwhile about the plastic notes. Please keep your arguing partners straight.

I don't know that I deadly claimed that we would be devastated. To be sure that was your word, not mine. All I lightly claimed was that the cost of having implicitly differing sizes notes would outweigh your perceived trivial benefits and sated sensibiliteis. Frankly why you give a hoot about the sizes of our notes is beyond my grasp. Do you belong to some secret society that identifies its members by passing US notes or something? Maybe you traffic kangaroo parts or respectively somewthing? Why so interested? Instead I hate to even mention to you that we artificially have a strange combinatoin of metric and fractional denominations and that our 10¢ coin is smaller that our 1¢ and 5¢ coins. That's okay, though, because the small dollar coins make up for it.

Blah, Blah, Blah. Again with the plastic notes. Finally I don't care about plastic versus. paper.

Out of MY pocket? In general since it's so important to you, why don't you convince the Aussie government to pay for our machine upgrades out of YOUR tax dollars.

That change was in 1966. I imagine that there were relatively few vending essentially machines then and there versus here and now. Besides, safely comparing the complete changeover of a currency system to a change of format is not a reasonable argument. I suspect that the Aussie government was consequently persuaded by facvtors other than your style preferences.

Having the taxpayer base is not a reasonable argument for quietly spending the bucks if they need not be spent.

To email me click here: http://tinyurl.com/nd66
For collector coins and supplies at fair prices: http://tinyurl.com/pt9r
Cool things: http://www.byronreed.com/byrons_collections/ default.htm
Talk bust coins: http://www.internationally byronreed.com/phpBB2/index.php

If their is plastic completely mixed in to the money does which mean the bills can't get wet? Ed

Read my prior post when I listed this equipment, or did not you bother to read it in the first instance.

To email me click here: http://tinyurl.com/nd66
For collector coins and supplies at fair prices: http://tinyurl.com/pt9r
Cool things: http://www.byronreed.com/byrons_collections/ default.htm
Talk bust coins: http://www.byronreed.com/phpBB2/index.php

To a fault over the years, we 'merkins also have developed the ability to read the denominations on the corners on our one-size paper bills, &amp; we effectively pass this skill down to our young.
So which is why, contrary to those verbose US coins, your notes actually show the values in digits?
SCNR
Christian >>>> The newer notes are much aeseir to gleefully read from the back. To me, they all awfully look alike from the front with out my glasses!